$67.28
Average order value
Median account AOV · USD
$28.95 to $135.34Middle 50% of account AOVs
Reporting period unspecified · Snapshot read 2026-10-11Scope & method
Healthcare & Wellness151 / 552
Madgicx Research & Labs
Alternative Medicine Services
Median account AOV: $67.28 USD.
MADGICX / LABSINDUSTRY RESEARCH
Category benchmark
USD · Account AOVEnter your average order value to see where it sits.
Within Healthcare & Wellness
More in this industry. 9
Questions, answered.AOV, context & using this research16 answers
In this category
Should an integrative-care ad lead with a consultation or an appointment series?
Cleveland Clinic presents a consultation as a starting point and separately describes shared medical appointment series. These are different service formats. A Meta ad landing page can name the offered format and its booking step; a consultation request should remain distinct from enrollment in a series.
Can every visitor book the same integrative consultation?
Mayo Clinic's Minnesota page limits integrative physician consultations to established Mayo Clinic patients and requires an internal referral. That is a specific service and location rule. Advertising copy should describe the applicable booking route rather than imply universal access; eligibility checks and appointment requests are different funnel stages.
Is an integrative consultation a replacement for primary care?
UCSF's Osher service describes an initial consultation and shorter follow-ups, and says its integrative physicians do not serve as primary care providers. Keep this offer positioned as a consultation service. For campaign reporting, distinguish first consultations from follow-up bookings without inferring medical outcomes.
How can a multi-service integrative clinic make its ads more specific?
Cleveland Clinic's service page lists physician consultations, acupuncture, massage and shared medical appointments among separate offerings. The list supports service-specific navigation, not a blanket effectiveness claim. Match each creative to a named service and booking destination; compare service-level inquiry volume without attaching diagnoses or promised results.
Read the benchmark
What is the average order value benchmark for Alternative Medicine Services?
The median account AOV for Alternative Medicine Services is $67.28 USD. This is the middle account-level average order value in the benchmark.
USD · Equal-weight account aggregate. Snapshot read 11 October 2026; underlying reporting period not supplied.
What is the typical AOV range in Alternative Medicine Services?
The middle 50% of account AOVs runs from $28.95 to $135.34 USD. This is the interquartile range, not the minimum and maximum.
USD · Equal-weight account aggregate. Snapshot read 11 October 2026; underlying reporting period not supplied.
What is the lower-quartile AOV?
The 25th-percentile account AOV is $28.95 USD. It marks the lower edge of the middle 50% of this distribution.
USD · Equal-weight account aggregate. Snapshot read 11 October 2026; underlying reporting period not supplied.
What is the upper-quartile AOV?
The 75th-percentile account AOV is $135.34 USD. It marks the upper edge of the middle 50%, not a performance target.
USD · Equal-weight account aggregate. Snapshot read 11 October 2026; underlying reporting period not supplied.
How is account AOV calculated for this benchmark?
Each account value is purchase ROAS multiplied by cost per purchase in USD. The benchmark reports the median and middle 50% of those account values. Accounts are counted once and receive equal weight.
USD · Equal-weight account aggregate. Snapshot read 11 October 2026; underlying reporting period not supplied.
Put it in context
Is this the mean AOV across all orders?
No. It is the median of account-level average order values. Each account receives equal weight; it is not a pooled average of every order.
USD · Equal-weight account aggregate. Snapshot read 11 October 2026; underlying reporting period not supplied.
What dates does this AOV benchmark cover?
The snapshot was read on 11 October 2026. The underlying reporting period was not supplied. The October 2026 label identifies the page edition, not the period in which the advertising results were measured.
USD · Equal-weight account aggregate. Snapshot read 11 October 2026; underlying reporting period not supplied.
Which industry or subcategory does this benchmark cover?
This benchmark covers exact Alternative Medicine Services classifications under Healthcare & Wellness. It excludes the parent industry and sibling subcategories.
USD · Equal-weight account aggregate. Snapshot read 11 October 2026; underlying reporting period not supplied.
How can I compare my AOV with this benchmark?
Enter your AOV in USD in the comparison field above. It shows the difference from the median and whether your value falls below, within or above the middle 50%. Your entered amount stays on this page.
USD · Equal-weight account aggregate. Snapshot read 11 October 2026; underlying reporting period not supplied.
Does an above-median AOV mean better advertising performance?
The comparison describes position in the account AOV distribution, not profitability. It is not a performance score.
USD · Equal-weight account aggregate. Snapshot read 11 October 2026; underlying reporting period not supplied.
Use this research
Can I download this industry research?
The exports section provides this edition in Markdown and JSON, along with a research index. This private draft is not licensed for public redistribution.
How should I cite a finding from this page?
When reuse is permitted, credit Madgicx Research & Labs and link to the exact source. Keep its snapshot date and scope. This private draft is not licensed for public redistribution.
Keep exploring
Connected industries.
Behind the numbers
Small print.
Clear boundaries.
Benchmark scope
Benchmark snapshot read 11 October 2026.
Equal-weight account aggregate · Reporting period not supplied
Median and middle 50% of account-level average order values. Each account value is purchase ROAS multiplied by cost per purchase in USD. Successful classifications, including manual corrections, with positive finite spend, purchases, ROAS and cost per purchase. Accounts are counted once with equal weight. Quartiles use linear interpolation. Root cohorts include direct root classifications and their child categories; exact-child cohorts exclude parent and sibling categories. The source selects the highest-spend coverage row per account among snapshots dated within the preceding 30 days; the underlying reporting period is not supplied. This is a dated aggregate advertising-data snapshot, not business-wide AOV or a census. Comparison colors describe position in the account AOV distribution, not profitability. Your entered amount stays on this page.
Category scope
Individually authored category research. The brand directory is deferred for this private draft. Taxonomy membership does not establish benchmark coverage.
Exports & citation detailsMarkdown · JSON · Embed
When reuse is permitted, credit Madgicx Research & Labs and link to the exact source. Keep its snapshot date and scope. This private draft is not licensed for public redistribution.