Optimization AI Ads Analytics Why Madgicx? About Us Blog Careers Case Studies Events Pricing Login Try for Free
Find your marketPublic research
Automotive Parts & Accessories227 / 552
A silver intake tube with blue elbow and cone filter on supports, with separate clamps, a coupler, bracket and blank sleeve. - Performance Upgrades Meta ads research by Madgicx Labs

Madgicx Research & Labs

Performance Upgrades

Median account AOV: $399.58 USD.

MADGICX / LABSINDUSTRY RESEARCH

Category benchmark

USD · Account AOV
$399.58

Average order value

Median account AOV · USD

$226.26 to $1,006.50Middle 50% of account AOVs
Reporting period unspecified · Snapshot read 2026-10-11Scope & method

Enter your average order value to see where it sits.

On your device

Within Automotive Parts & Accessories

More in this industry. 7

Questions, answered.AOV, context & using this research16 answers

In this category

Does EPA evaluation mean endorsement?

EPA states that its voluntary retrofit evaluation does not approve, certify or endorse a product. A performance ad should cite only an actual product-specific report and avoid an EPA-approved badge.

Source Link to answer
What does the evaluation program examine?

EPA says the program analyzes devices and additives marketed for fuel-economy or emissions effects. Creative can identify the claimed attribute and require its own evidence rather than infer a benefit from the category.

Source Link to answer
Can a generic upgrade image prove a result?

EPA describes technical reports for specific devices, not a category-wide performance guarantee. An ad can show component design while keeping any measured result tied to the exact test and configuration.

Source Link to answer
How should a test reference be presented?

EPA lists individual test reports within its evaluation program. A landing page can link to the exact report if applicable, then separate that evidence from the seller’s broader marketing interpretation.

Source Link to answer

Read the benchmark

What is the average order value benchmark for Performance Upgrades?

The median account AOV for Performance Upgrades is $399.58 USD. This is the middle account-level average order value in the benchmark.

USD · Equal-weight account aggregate. Snapshot read 11 October 2026; underlying reporting period not supplied.

Source Link to answer
What is the typical AOV range in Performance Upgrades?

The middle 50% of account AOVs runs from $226.26 to $1,006.50 USD. This is the interquartile range, not the minimum and maximum.

USD · Equal-weight account aggregate. Snapshot read 11 October 2026; underlying reporting period not supplied.

Source Link to answer
What is the lower-quartile AOV?

The 25th-percentile account AOV is $226.26 USD. It marks the lower edge of the middle 50% of this distribution.

USD · Equal-weight account aggregate. Snapshot read 11 October 2026; underlying reporting period not supplied.

Source Link to answer
What is the upper-quartile AOV?

The 75th-percentile account AOV is $1,006.50 USD. It marks the upper edge of the middle 50%, not a performance target.

USD · Equal-weight account aggregate. Snapshot read 11 October 2026; underlying reporting period not supplied.

Source Link to answer
How is account AOV calculated for this benchmark?

Each account value is purchase ROAS multiplied by cost per purchase in USD. The benchmark reports the median and middle 50% of those account values. Accounts are counted once and receive equal weight.

USD · Equal-weight account aggregate. Snapshot read 11 October 2026; underlying reporting period not supplied.

Source Link to answer

Put it in context

Is this the mean AOV across all orders?

No. It is the median of account-level average order values. Each account receives equal weight; it is not a pooled average of every order.

USD · Equal-weight account aggregate. Snapshot read 11 October 2026; underlying reporting period not supplied.

Source Link to answer
What dates does this AOV benchmark cover?

The snapshot was read on 11 October 2026. The underlying reporting period was not supplied. The October 2026 label identifies the page edition, not the period in which the advertising results were measured.

USD · Equal-weight account aggregate. Snapshot read 11 October 2026; underlying reporting period not supplied.

Source Link to answer
Which industry or subcategory does this benchmark cover?

This benchmark covers exact Performance Upgrades classifications under Automotive Parts & Accessories. It excludes the parent industry and sibling subcategories.

USD · Equal-weight account aggregate. Snapshot read 11 October 2026; underlying reporting period not supplied.

Source Link to answer
How can I compare my AOV with this benchmark?

Enter your AOV in USD in the comparison field above. It shows the difference from the median and whether your value falls below, within or above the middle 50%. Your entered amount stays on this page.

USD · Equal-weight account aggregate. Snapshot read 11 October 2026; underlying reporting period not supplied.

Source Link to answer
Does an above-median AOV mean better advertising performance?

The comparison describes position in the account AOV distribution, not profitability. It is not a performance score.

USD · Equal-weight account aggregate. Snapshot read 11 October 2026; underlying reporting period not supplied.

Source Link to answer

Use this research

Can I download this industry research?

The exports section provides this edition in Markdown and JSON, along with a research index. This private draft is not licensed for public redistribution.

Source Link to answer
How should I cite a finding from this page?

When reuse is permitted, credit Madgicx Research & Labs and link to the exact source. Keep its snapshot date and scope. This private draft is not licensed for public redistribution.

Source Link to answer

Behind the numbers

Small print.
Clear boundaries.

Benchmark scope

Benchmark snapshot read 11 October 2026.

Equal-weight account aggregate · Reporting period not supplied

Median and middle 50% of account-level average order values. Each account value is purchase ROAS multiplied by cost per purchase in USD. Successful classifications, including manual corrections, with positive finite spend, purchases, ROAS and cost per purchase. Accounts are counted once with equal weight. Quartiles use linear interpolation. Root cohorts include direct root classifications and their child categories; exact-child cohorts exclude parent and sibling categories. The source selects the highest-spend coverage row per account among snapshots dated within the preceding 30 days; the underlying reporting period is not supplied. This is a dated aggregate advertising-data snapshot, not business-wide AOV or a census. Comparison colors describe position in the account AOV distribution, not profitability. Your entered amount stays on this page.

Category scope

Individually authored category research. The brand directory is deferred for this private draft. Taxonomy membership does not establish benchmark coverage.

Exports & citation detailsMarkdown · JSON · Embed

When reuse is permitted, credit Madgicx Research & Labs and link to the exact source. Keep its snapshot date and scope. This private draft is not licensed for public redistribution.

Benchmark embed preview

External embedding stays locked during private review.

Ready to copy

Select the text, then use your device’s Copy command.

Find your market
Explore the spectrum
70 industries · 482 subcategoriesOpen the index ↗